Case study · Performance · Risk
Performance & risk scorecards
Scorecards that update the same record buyers and risk teams use.
The challenge
Supplier performance lived in slide decks, and risk lived in a separate tool, so the two never met on the same record. Renewal conversations turned on who argued hardest rather than on evidence, and failing suppliers surfaced only after the damage was done.
Approach
- Shared scorecards kept on the supplier master
- Risk signals visible to the relationship owner
- Performance and risk read from one record
- Actions logged with owners and due dates
- Renewal reviews built from the same evidence
Results
- Clearer, evidence-led renewal decisions
- Fewer surprise supplier failures
- One place for performance and risk evidence
- Accountability through owned actions
- Less time spent reconciling conflicting reports
Modules used
More case studies
Case study · National Fuel
National Fuel achieves 98% data accuracy
Supplier data accuracy above 98%, with expected gains in RFP and onboarding efficiency.
Case study · Greenberg Traurig
GT Law cuts invoice management time by 27%
Invoice management efficiency improved 27%, with supplier data accuracy above 98%.
Case study · Thermo Fisher
Thermo Fisher: weeks to hours on federal reports
Supplier data visibility improved 90%, and federal reporting preparation dropped from several weeks to a few hours, before expansion in 2026.
Next step
Show us the mess.
We'll show you the record.
Thirty minutes with someone who has run procurement, using your data, framed for a similar working session.
A working session, not a pitch
Bring a raw spend export or supplier list and see your own data.
Replace or orchestrate
We'll say which path fits, including when neither one fits yet.
No homework required
Messy files are fine. Cleaning them up is the product's job.